Islamic and Jewish Sufis in Mediaeval Cairo

 


In his Kifaya, Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam (1186–1237) states the principle that his Pietist Path (Suluk al-Khass) is a Jewish one that had been lost but rediscovered in Islamic Sufism. For example, in defending the way that he and his fellow Jewish Sufis adopted  special clothing that was  similar to the attire of the Islamic Sufis, he insisted:

Do not regard as unseemly our comparison of that [the true dress of the prophets] to the conduct of the Sufis, for the latter imitate the prophets [of Israel] and walk in their footsteps, not the prophets in theirs. [1]

And using the exact and precise Sufi terminology of khirqa,murid,and tariq from the Islamic Sufi initiation ceremony he explains:

By casting his cloak over [Elisha], Elijah hinted to him, as if in joyful annunciation, that his garments and dress as well as the rest of his conduct would be like his. Thus he announced to him the fact that Elijah’s spiritual perfection would be transferred to him and that he [Elisha] would attain the degree which he himself had attained. Thou art aware of the ways of the ancient saints [awliya] of Israel, which are not or but little practised among our contemporaries, that have now become the practice of the Sufis of Islam, “on account of the iniquities of Israel,” namely that the master invests the novice [murid] with a cloak [khirqah] as the latter is about to enter upon the mystical path [tariq]. “They have taken up thine own words” (Deuteronomy 33:3). This is why we moreover take over from them and emulate them in the wearing of sleeveless tunics and the like. [2]

(emphasis mine)

 Some scholars receive,with some reserve, Rabbenu’s stated belief that the Jewish prophetic practices were lost and hidden in Islam, and they frequently opine that his reforms and innovations were simply his highly creative and original adoption and development of  Islamic practices in Jewish prayer and contemplation.  Others say that he had observed the profound spirituality and decorum of Islamic devotions  and liturgy and was simply impressed by their potential to increase the kind of kavanah in Jewish worship that could lead to devekut.  Whichever combination of these possibilities we prefer, we should also remember that the area of Northern Egypt itself was a place where a cross-fertilisation of  the eremitic and  ascetic ideas held by the three Abrahamic contemplative traditions was an established, easily observed, and highly active  process—though it may  rarely have been formally acknowledged.

oo0oo

Then, as now, there are Jews who want  to make  the communal liturgy more beautiful  and more conducive to the development of  individual reflection; who seek to go the  extra mile  in the observance of all the  ethical and ritual commandments; who (above all) wish to develop their personal and private contemplative devotions to the point  where they may lose the self in order to find God.

Liturgical and devotional intentionality  was a major part of the  motivation behind the  European Hasidic movement pioneered by the  Baal Shem Tov. The search for a developed  "interior life" was also the  impetus behind many “New Age”groups that sprang up in the hippie 1960’s, groups which frequently looked outside Judaism— to India  and the Far East— for inspiration.

In the last seventy years or so, within Judaism, popular kabbalistic and spirituality-based movements have  burgeoned globally in response to the lacuna such people  had  felt in many congregational and denominational settings, and many mediational groups within our Nation are currently hoping to develop the philosophic and contemplative tools which many hope may hasten the  promised return of  ruah hakodesh and nevuahThis is an explicit aim of our own Tariqa and one which we share with Rabbenu Abraham’s circle.

During the mediaeval period, the  Hasidim of Cairo and  Northern Egypt were engaged in the  same search for inspiration as all the  aforementioned groups  and (like the members of our own Tariqa) they looked towards Islamic Sufism for some guidance and stimulation.   They found it in abundance during the Mamluk era because at that time Islamic Sufism was very much in the  ascendant.

With its strong similarities to both the ancient Jewish ecstatic/prophetic kabbalah, and to the later Beshtian movement’s focus on contemplative  activity, Islamic Sufism gave  a kick-start to these pious Cairene Jews, enabling them  to take the  best of what they saw and learnt from the mystics of Islam, filter it through a strict halakhic lens, and then incorporate it into a new system of Jewish  spiritual activity.  It was no small enterprise.  During the period between the eleventh and fifteenth centuries it became  a huge and popular movement that spread over most of the  Egyptian and Syrian Jewish world, and its influential echoes would be  discernable in the practice of the  Safed mystics.

oo0oo

Our Tariqa is commited to the principle that the  main area of our study and  the source of our contemplative and devotional practice is the Hebrew Scriptures, and principally the Torah of Moses and the Elijan mesorah.

But our Foundation statement also indicates that we should  follow the  example of the Egyptian Pietists  and also learn from the early Islamic Sufi texts  and practitioners. It is well known that Ibn Pequda and  the Maimunis quoted from the Quran itself,with or without adaptation or attribution. 

Abraham ben HaRambam, his colleague Abraham He-Hasid, Obadyah Maimuni, and David ben Joshua Maimuni all stated quite clearly that they believed their Jewish-Sufi movement to be a renewal of the   lost prophetic silsila of the  Biblical Schools of the Prophets—the memory of certain aspects of which had been preserved in the eremitical,devotional, and meditative thought and practices of Islamic Sufism.  So one might wonder:

Who and What were they “seeing”?— What was it that they were observing, witnessing, and imitating in Cairo that sparked their interest and profound admiration?

Cairo was actually the site  of the Sa’id al-Su’ada (Salihiyya), the very first major Sufi Khanqah to have been founded in Egypt (by Saladin in 1173) and built to house three hundred sufis. Significantly, we know that these sufis performed frequent and regular discourses and lectures in the public spaces of Cairo. Though the second-class  status of Jews  as dhimmis would  have precluded their participatory presence in Mosques, they may well have observed more private practices and lectures, even if that may have only been through open porticos or  windows. We know, for example that there was an Islamic-Sufi Zawiya in the  heart of the Jewish Quarter during Rabbenu Abraham’s  nagidship.

In crowded and overpopulated Cairo, which was larger than most major European cities at this time, the houses were often multi-storey and tightly packed and we can only surmise what educational cross-fertilisation might have transpired in private conversations or even meetings in such close-quartered situations.

oo0oo

Turning now to mention briefly the Islamic-Sufi authors and leaders who were certainly familiar to the  Mediaeval Egyptian Pietists

In his detailed and panoramic essay: Sufis and Jews in Mamluk Egypt,  Professor Paul Fenton lists many of the Islamic-Sufi exemplars whose presence in Cairo must have had a significant role in the development of the Jewish Pietist movement in Ayyubid and Mamluk times.

Here is  a concise  introductory summary of some of the personages he mentions, re-presented here in the  hope that members of our Tariqa Eliyahu HaNabi who wish to examine such Islamic influences may use this information to direct and focus their researches for the  benefit of us all:

  • The poet ‘Umar Ibn al-Farid (d. 1235),
  • Abu l-asan al-Shadhili (1196-1258)
  • Ahmad al-Badawi (1199-1276),
  • Abu l-Abbās al-Mursī (12191287)
  • Ibn Ata Allah al-Iskandari (1259-1309).


Abu l-Hasan al-Shadhili (1196-1258)—one of the  greatest  Sufi Shaykhs in Egypt— was known to have discussions with the Jews of Cairo. Though his official lodge was in  Alexandria, he had  a Jewish optician in Cairo and  it seems  extremely likely to me that he might  have met Rabbenu Abraham (in his capacity as Leader of the  Jewish community there)  or  other  members of his circle.

Some of the stellar Moslem Teachers and Saints in the  above shortlist were the  founding generators  of major Sufi Orders —and their presence in the Cairo of our spiritual predecessors must surely have been a great inspiration to Jews seeking Sufi contact.  After all, these people and their followers were the living and local exemplars that the Jewish Pietists  encountered (either in person or in an observing crowd) during public cermonies and  lectures.

When they speak of the  admiration they felt for the Sufi Way, their comments must have been based on what they saw and read and heard.   Rabbenu Abraham was not imagining what Sufi practice was when he  wrote the Kifaya, he was living in one of its major Egyptian Sufi centres.

In his magisterial and profound  study Judaism, Sufism, and the Pietists of Medieval Egypt,  Elisha Russ Fishbane writes:

We have direct testimony of pietists personally observing Sufi rites in the first half of the thirteenth century and an explicit acknowledgement of adopting similar, if not identical, rites in their own circles.  [3]

In many instances, Sufi terms were adopted by the pietists in their original forms, while in others cases Hebrew terms were applied in novel ways, as with derekh roughly supplanting taṛīqah as a designation for the spiritual path and, most significantly, the term hasid ̣ replacing sụ̄fī as the chief appellation of the devotee.[4]

oo0oo

One of the key practices of the  Egyptian Pietists, a lengthy exposition of which is  found in the Kifaya, is the practice of geo-physical seclusion.  The many varieties of  seclusion (Khalwa/hitbodedut) that Rabbenu Abraham described and proposed for his group in the Kifaya included a specific forty-day practice that he and his colleagues were sure to have witnessed in Cairo.

This classic Sufi practice of geo-physical khalwah —a forty day isolation-retreat, often in darkness, and involving fasting,the avoidance of day-time sleep, and rising to perform contemplative exercises (often involving prostrations) at midnightwas a core recommended practice of the Cairene Jewish Sufis.

 Although Rabbenu Abraham, like Ibn Pequda, lauded interior “solitude in the  crowd”, he also envisaged that those who were on the highest levels of human intellectual and spiritual attainment would actually be required to practice such total  physically isolated and secluded retreat if they were to become prophets.  Though this was not not expected of all members, it was certainly the mark of those engaged in the final Maqamat (Station) of the Kifaya’s system, and it was a principal element in the Murshid of Rabbenu David Maimuni II.

Rabbenu Abraham clearly refers to this type of isolated retreat as follows:  

We also see the  Sufis of Islam proceed in this war against the  self to the combating of sleep, and perhaps that practice is derived from the  statement from David: “I will not give sleep to mine eyes,nor slumber to mine eyelids,and also from his statement: “At midnight I will rise to give thanks to Thee” and the like.  It may furthermore be inferred from the  statement of the  messenger,peace be upon him,concerning his seclusion on the  mountain in His Presence,exalted be He: “So I fell down before the  Lord, the forty days  and forty nights that I fell down,” that he, peace be upon him,was in one state during that period,by day and by night,and that he  did not sleep in the course of it, just as he did not eat...

Observe then these wonderful traditions and sigh with regret over how they have been transferred from us  and [have]made their appearance... among other nations. [meaning Islam].[5]

Though the ascetic-contemplative practice of solitary isolation in small and  dark places is described in our own scriptures (notably in relation to the Mosaic Cleft in the  Rock, and  the  Cave of Elijah), the practice of khalwa/hitbodedut was also a key practice of the  Prophet of Islam himself, and it  became  an essential hallmark devotion of the Islamic Sufis during the eleventh and twelfth centuries— the very period in which the Egyptian Pietists were first formulating their own ascetic schemata.

 It has actually been demonstrated that it was also  in Egypt (during the thirteenth  and  fourteenth centuries) that total khalwah ( under the direction of a Teacher) first became  an initiatory and often obligatory practice for Islamic-Sufis.

It is also this practice of the forty day “arba‘īnīyah” retreat  that the famous letter from  Benyamin to Hayyim ben Hananel  refers.[6]

Professor Russ-Fishbane writes:

Abraham Maimonides explicitly referred to the Sufi practice of solitary retreat in dark places (al-khalawāt fīl-mawādị al-mudallamah ̣ ), which his colleague Abraham ibn Abī’l-Rabī‘ {Abraham HeHasid} had praised as an original discipline of the ancient prophets.[7]

The activities of the Islamic-Sufi hermits in the Muqqatam mountains of Cairo[8] would have been extremely familiar to Rabbenu Abraham’s circle—and it does not require any stretch of the imagination to consider that some of the Pietists would also have practised khalwah there themselves. We know that Rabbenu Abraham’s father in law, Hananel ben Samuel—who was described by his contemporaries as “the greatest of the Pietists”— practiced forty-day seclusion in the mountains....and sometimes retreats of an even longer duration.  Professor Russ-Fishbane concludes:

We can only assume that the practice of solitary meditation, whether daily or nightly in one’s home or undertaken on periodic “journeys” to the surrounding mountainside, was a basic discipline common to pietists and Sufis alike in early thirteenth-century Egypt. (See also Daniel ibn al-Māshitaḥ’s description of those pietists and disciples of the prophets who trust in God to provide for their needs and seclude themselves in the mountains and wilderness (inqitạ̄ al-hasidim wa-talmide ha-nevi ̣ im fīl-jibāl wal-barādī) in his Rectification of Religion, in II Firk. I.3132, 69, verso.)

Further afield,in the  region of the Giza Pyramids we also know that there was a Synagogue with a Jewish Sufi retreat centre at Dammuh which is known to have hosted both annual Jewish pilgrimages and incubatory retreats— with what is thought to be certain rooms that acted as Pietist solitary isolation-retreat cells. It is also taught  that Rabbenu Obadyah Maimuni died there in the Dammuh complex  while on such a retreat. [9]

oo0oo

In his Sufis and Jews in Mamluk Egypt,[10]  Professor Fenton reminds us  that the Cairo Genizah is replete with fragments of  Islamic-Sufi texts that might well represent the kind of material that one could find in the  library of a mediaeval Jewish Pietist. He also points  out the great significance  that their very presence in a genizah—a reposititory for “holy” texts— indicates that they were held in the utmost respect by our Jewish Sufi forebears in Cairo.

He lists the following Islamic-Sufi authors and texts who are represented in the  Cairo Genizah, reminding us that these are  but a small proportion of that category:

  •   The Risala of al-Qushayri (d.1072)
  •   Poems by al-Hallaj (858-922)
  •   The Mahasin al-Majalis of the Andalusi mystic Ibn al-Arif  (1088-1141)
  •   The Munqid min al-dalal, of al-Gazali, (1058-1111)
  •   The Kalimat al-tasawwuf, Raqım al quds and the Hayakil al-nur of  Suhrawardī (1154-1191)

(Many scholars have related the works of Al Gazali to those of Rabbenu Abraham, and the Ishraqi works of Suhrawardi to many Pietist manuscripts especially those of Rabbenu David ben Joshua Maimuni. For this reason, perhaps  these two authors might be  high in our list for group study)

In the latter part of the  Mamluk period under examination, several nascent Sufi Orders were also represented in Cairo. Professor Fenton mentions:

  •   The Shadhiliyya,
  •   The Rifaíyya,
  •   The Burhaniyya
  •   The Qadiriyya

And Boaz Shoshan in his Popular Culture in Medieval Cairo [11]adds:

  •   The  Wafaiyya
  •   The Ahmadiyya
  •   The Qalandariyya
  •   The Khalwatiyya

Most scholars opine that the Shadhiliyya and the  Rifaiyya Orders  were to become  the  regionally predominant orders in the centuries during which the  Mediaeval Jewish Pietist movement was to spread throughout Egypt and Syria under the patronage  of the Maimuni Nagidim. Al-Qinai (d.1195) and   Al-Shadhili (d.1258) were perhaps the most important Sufi Saints in the  Northern regions of Egypt, but it was al-Shadhili whose disciples were eventually to grow into a formal Sufi Order three generations  after the  founder’s death.

These then, are the  Islamic-Sufi  authors and groups  who deserve our special study if  we are to delve into the historical factors and the inspirational texts which so moved Rabbenu Abraham and the Egyptian Pietists.  They believed that  our very own Jewish and  prophetic systems of  asceticism, spiritual growth, and contemplation were hidden there— just waiting  for us to restore and develop them anew.   

May our Tariqa Eliyahu HaNabi advance this area of study to enrich our practice of  Judaism and, to borrow a phrase from the Kifaya, in this way may our understanding of the Sufi Path become an instrument for the  rebirth of Israel.

 

[Part of the Jewish tradition] has been transferred to the nations among whom [the Jews] reside and has become [re]established among the Jewish people through [the influence of] the nations. Providence has ordained that [Jewish tradition] will disappear from among them while they reside [among the nations], until they repent and turn in repentance unto God, on account of which they will be delivered. In this way, the nations will become the instrument for the rebirth of [Israel]…

Kifaya of Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam[12]

 

©Nachman Davies

(for inclusion in  The  Mitkarevim)

Safed Jan 4 2023




[1] S. Rosenblatt, ed., The High Ways to Perfection of Abraham Maimonides, II, p32

[2] Rosenblatt II: 263&foll.

[3] (citing: Rosenblatt’s Highways:  266, ll. 4–5, 9–10, and 322, ll. 5–7)

[4] Russ-Fishbane E., Judaism, Sufism, and the Pietists of Medieval Egypt, p 52

[5] Rosenblatt 2 p322)

[6] Russ-Fishbane,p 115

[7] Russ-Fishbane, 120

[8] These Muqqatam mountains are the same place to which the famous “Jewish addict to Sufism  had retired in permanent retreat. [recorded in a  letter to David Maimuni II sometime  between 1355 and 1367]

[9] Russ- Fishbane, p.113

[10] Paul B. Fenton, “Sufis and Jews in Mamluk Egypt,” in Stephan Conermann, ed., Muslim-Jewish Relations in the Middle Islamic Period, Jews in the Ayyubid and Mamluk Sultanates (1171-1517),Bonn University Press, 2017, pp.41-62

[11] In Popular Culture in Medieval Cairo (Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization),1993,Cambridge University Press.

[12] (TS Ar. 22.12, ll. 10–16) a fragment from the lost last section of the Kfaya quoted in Russ Fishbane p242)

 

The Hilula of R. Abraham ben HaRambam 2022

                     

(kever of HaRambam in Tverya circa 1927)


The Hilula of Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam, who died on Kislev 18 4998/December 7 1237, falls this year on this coming  Monday: December 12 2022   

Earlier this year I discovered that - according to a [validated] mediaeval manuscript from the fourteenth century (Megilla Firenza Ms. Magl. III, 43) -  he is buried in Tverya next to the grave of HaRambam. 

The manuscript in question  displays a clear illustration of the location of the grave of HaRambam and the nearby grave of  a Rabbi described as “Rabbi Abraham his son” with the text “the author of the Kifaya” ר' אברהם בנו בעל הכיפאת written under it.  (the “Kifaya” being the sefer which was later translated as R. Abraham’s  Sefer HaMaspiq.)

 My discovery was made because of the publication of a wonderful study of the Firenza scroll by Dr. Rachel Sarfati in an illustrated book: “The  Florence Scroll, a 14th century pictorial pilgrimage”.

 The following is a transcript of certain passages from  my article on this discovery  published in May 2022 on  the “Jewish Contemplatives website” which you may view HERE.....  with a new and topical postscript at the conclusion of this new post.

oo0oo

The Megilla Firenza  is

 “a little-known 14th-century scroll whose illustrations and texts trace the journey of its maker, a Jewish Egyptian painter, from Cairo to Lebanon through the land of Israel and its holy sites. Eleven meters long and featuring some 130 places and landmarks, the Florence Scroll (so-called because it is housed in the National Central Library of Florence) is the second oldest extant document – after the 6th-century Madaba map – to offer a detailed and extensive portrayal of the land of Israel.” *3

The curator of  the 2021-2022 Israel Museum exhibition of the scroll was Dr. Rachel Sarfati and she has completed a fully illustrated  study of the megilla.  Though the existence of the Megilla Firenza was news to me, she has been painstakingly studying it since 2011.

On Pages 106-108 of her new book, “The  Florence Scroll,a 14th century pictorial pilgrimage”,  Dr. Sarfati  states that the  Florentine Scroll contains strong evidence that the grave of Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam (1186–1237 C.E.)  lies in the near vicinity of the  graves of his father and grandfather in Tverya.

In the Scroll’s  illustration of that Tverya site, to the left of the kever of the Rambam, we see a tomb with the superscript “Abraham” and the  word “Kifaya”.  She writes:

The inscription accompanying the illustration of R. Avraham's tombstone [in the Florentine  scroll]  consists of an abbreviation of the name of the sefer that he wrote in Arabic: Kifayat al-Abadin, (Sufficient for the Servants of God), which surely indicates that this is  a reference to [Abraham] the son of the Rambam, who was governor of the Jews of Egypt in the first half of the 13th century.

Dr. Sarfati reminds us that Rabbi Abraham ben HaRambam passed away in 1237,and she concludes that the megilla had to be drawn after that date, suggesting the first decade of the fourteenth century. Significantly, the assumed Tverya tomb of  R’ David Maimuni I (died 1300)*4 does not figure in the Megilla Firenza. Dr. Sarfati posits that the reason for the omission might be because she believes that the scroll was written after R’ David HaNagid passed away but probably before his bones were brought to Tiberias for reburial. 

 It is highly likely that that the Egyptian owner of the Florentine Scroll was himself connected to the ‘Maimonidean’ Fostat Jewish community (though  obviously not at the  time Rabbenu Abraham was Nagid) and consequently [in my opinion] he  would  certainly have been aware of the Kifaya.  

Furthermore, I wonder if the reason for reference to the Kifaya is because the owner was a Jewish Sufi  himself. If this were so, perhaps the reason R’ David I Maimonides does not get a mention on the scroll might be because of his somewhat negative attitude to  the way the Egyptian Pietist movement was developing during his nagidship. Although many members of the Maimonidean dynasty (especially Rabbeinu Abraham, R'Obadyah Maimuni, and R'David ben Joshua Maimuni) were all staunch supporters of  ascetic and solitary practice,  R'David (Obadyah's brother) had strong reservations.*5

 I would also suggest that it is also notable that the tomb of R'Abraham, unlike some of the neighbouring tombs drawn in this section of the scroll, is crowned with the the same kind of prominent canopy attributed to his illustrious father.  These factors would amplify the Jewish-Sufi significance  of the illustration in the Florentine  Scroll.

Though the Kifaya we know today (usually in translation as Rosenblatt’s Highways to Perfection  or Wincelberg’s Guide for the  Servants of God) is reconstructed from fragments and is far from complete, the sections which have come down to us (so far) are, without doubt, the foundational manual for Jewish-Sufis to this day—a Jewish Kitab Adab al-Muridin as it were.

The mention of the Kifaya on the Megilla Firenza is a clear indicator of its great significance to the creator of the scroll, and may also be evidence of its general fame.  As Professor Paul B. Fenton has intimated, though it has been somewhat neglected in recent times Rabbeinu Abraham’s complete and monumental Kifaya was once  widely distributed and studied. Professor Fenton writes:

By dint of its sheer volume, this work was probably the most important product of all Judaeo-Arabic literature. In its original form the work consisted of four parts, each divided into ten sections, each of which was again subdivided into ten chapters. Only two parts have come down to us in a more or less complete state, they alone containing 500 pages. Supposing that the remaining chapters were of the same scale, the work must have consisted of about 2,500 pages, i.e. thrice the size of the Mishneh Tôrâh.*6


The  section of the megilla showing the graves of  the Rambam and R’Abraham *7


The descriptor reads: ר' אברהם בנו בעל הכיפאת 


ooOoo

My purpose in republishing those facts here and at this time is to arouse and encourage support for a commemorative monument or plaque to be created at the Tverya site to commemorate Rabbenu Abraham Maimuni.

ooOoo

Here are some of the wall plaques that are currently displayed on the site in Tverya (photos 2021) :

The father of the Rambam and Nagid David Maimuni 1 both have commemorative memorials and informative wall plaques at the Rambam’s grave site in Tverya, but to date there is nothing whatsoever there to suggest that Rabbenu Abraham was buried there, and nothing describing and commemorating his contribution to Judaism.

This is almost certainly because the existence of the illustration in the  Firenza scroll describing his burial location has only just been discovered and is not widely known even now.  I myself only heard of it by chance through my archeologist friend Dr. Yossi Stepansky and when I passed the information on to  Professor Paul Fenton in March 2022, even he had been unaware of it.

I am told that there is some disagreement about which members of the Maimuni dynasty are actually buried at that precise Tverya spot, but the sound evidence of this newly identified illustration confirms the burial place of HaRambam and his illustrious son,Rabbenu Abraham. I would like to suggest that a memorial monument, or at the very least, a fourth blue commemorative plaque be installed at the Tverya Kever site to celebrate Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam’s highly significant contribution to Judaism.

If I were a rich man, I would pay for this myself. But I am not. Members of our Tariqa Eliyahu HaNabi are therefore requested to share this article widely in the hope that some memorial may be created. It would be great if our Israeli members and members with global influence might propose the idea to potential sponsors, especially to Tverya city council.

ooOoo

On Monday, with the  help of heaven, I intend  to visit the  grave-site in Tverya and say some  prayers there for our Tariqa.  May the merits  of the tzaddikim shield us, and may the memory of Rabbenu Abraham inspire us to be ever more devoted in our attempts to serve G-d, and arrive  at true deveykut. Amen. 

©Nachman Davies

Motsei Shabbat 10th December 2022




ooo0ooo


Notes


*3 R.Sarfati, The Florence Scroll: a 14th century pictorial pilgrimage from Egypt to the Land of Israel, 2021,Israel Museum Jerusalem.

*4 Not to be confused with R’David Maimuni II (R’ David Ben Joshua) who died 1415 C.E. and who authored the profoundly Jewish-Sufi classic entitled Al-murshid ila t-tafarrud wal-murfid ila t-tajarrud  (usually known as Al Murshid).

*5  see Midrash Rabbi David HaNagid,Paris, MS BN Heb.297,fol.44a

*6 Fenton.P,  Maimonides—Father and Son;Continuity and Change, in Traditions of Maimonideanism,ed. C. Fraenkel,Brill,Leiden 2009, page 114.
 
*7 These two illustrations are scans from a purchased copy of  Dr. Sarfati’s book on  Florence, Ms. Magl. III, 43 / Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, Firenze.   To purchase the book: https://imjshop.com/product/the-florence-scroll-a-14th-century-pictorial-pilgrimage-from-egypt-to-the-land-of-israel/
 
 

Sufic Knowledge

 


The last member of the Maimuni dynasty to hold the rank of Rayis al-Yehud and the title Nagid was Rabbenu David ben Joshua (1335–c.1414),sometimes referred to as David Maimonides II. Rabbenu David Maimuni II was the author of the dynasty’s most adventurously Sufic volume,Murshid ila al-tafarrud, known in English as The Guide to Solitude or The Guide to Detachment. It openly quotes the Quran and contains some of our most developed (extant) statements of a Jewish-Sufi mystical theology.

 

 Like his forebears, he was active in Egypt before moving  to Aleppo and then Damascus in Syria (in 1375), yet he  still functioned as head of the Egyptian community at such a great distance.  His Syrian Library, one of the  very largest in the region, included countless Islamic-Sufi manuscripts and it is not beyond reasonable conjecture to suggest that this library may have been one of the channels through which Sufi knowledge  and descriptions of contemplative  practice reached the Northern Galil— and may have thus been absorbed into later Safed kabbala.

 

In a letter from the Cairo Genizah, identified and translated by Professor Paul B. Fenton, Rabbenu David makes it quite clear that he admired and lauded the Islamic-Sufi understanding of True Knowledge, accessed through solitude (khalwa) and through  intuitive  and contemplative meditation. In the following extract, some might even sense a veiled description of the way the “wine” of mystical union is produced from the  “grapes”of the  Halakha.

 

The religious law can merely conduct you in a plain path unto God through allusions and hints, and will teach you noble virtues, prohibiting what will harm you and showing you what will bestow felicity in your religious and worldly pursuits, and will guide you with its merciful leads to a place where it will provide a welcome haven. 

I have given abundant hints to you about these notions, providing that you are someone who can dive into an ocean, in whose depths pearls are to be found and on whose shores are shells that are not merely encountered by chance.

Beware lest you learn from its words that philosophy or wisdom is derived from the Peripatetics or any other. Nay! I have in mind rather the adepts of spiritual training (riyada), who have discovered in their solitary devotions (khalwat)(that which leads) from the couch unto the Throne. 

They have certain knowledge and are not niggardly with it but instruct in the wayfaring of the path that leads to God. Your knowledge of that is knowledge indeed, and all other knowledge deriving from the famous philosophers is false.

(translation Professor Paul B.Fenton)

 

 

 

 

(from The Mitkarevim Chapter 13)

©nachmandavies safed 2022  

Jewish-Sufi Practices

 

(Dome in Safed:   from a photo by J.Lebowitz)
A member of our Tariqa enquired what the key practices of Jewish-Sufism might be. In reply, here is an extract from my book The Mitkarevim that outlines the very basic elements: 

“......There are many forms of practice that might be termed “Jewish Sufi Practice” and they all depend on the nature of a practitioner’s view of what constitutes “Sufism” itself. Our particular Jewish Sufi group —Tariqa Eliyahu Ha-Nabi— is not Innayati, Universalist, Synchretic or Secular and it is not founded as an Interfaith group.

 

Our own specific “path” follows the halakhic practice of the movement led by R.Abraham He-Hasid and Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam....and our aim is to renew and develop that practice in our twenty-first century environment.

 

Though there is much to be gleaned from the work of R.Obadyah and R.David II Maimuni, we might first look to the Kifaya  and the reforms of Rabbenu Abraham ben HaRambam for our principal definition of Jewish-Sufi practice.

In his introduction to the “Treatise of the Pool” Professor Paul B. Fenton gives a beautiful and succint overview of that Jewish Sufi Practice (on pages 13 to 21). A brief list derived from that section of his book might provide us with a useful outline of some essential components of a Jewish Sufi practice. Here is a precis list of what Professor Fenton wrote there:

1. Ablution
‘stringent laws of ablution before prayer,including the washing of the feet’

2. Prostration
‘in various parts of the liturgy,which had formerly been been abolished’

3. Kneeling
‘in other parts of the daily liturgy’

4. The spreading of the hands
‘at certain supplications the worshipper would stretch forth his hands with upstretched hands’

5. Weeping
‘advocated... as a special expedient to prayer’

6. Orientation
In communal worship: ‘standing in rows, in Muslim fashion, fac[ing] the Holy Ark at all times’

7.Vigils and Fasting
‘supererogatory supplication,which most often took the form of nocturnal vigils’

8. Solitude/seclusion
‘periods of voluntary seclusion (khalwa)’ especially the forty day retreat.

9. Incubation
Rabbenu Abraham quotes the practice of Samuel the Prophet who ‘practiced ḥalwah in the tabernacle until he attained communion with the Divine through prophetic sleep’

10. Dhikr (Zhikr)
Professor Fenton states that we have no record of communal dhikr in Rabbenu Abraham’s circle as ‘ One can only assume that such a ceremony would have met with severe disapproval from more conservative circles in view of its strictly Islamic character’. He then goes on to suggest that evidence of private dhikr may be adduced from a saying of R. Abraham He-Hassid (Rabbenu Abraham’s Teacher) that ‘One can attain to the spiritual world through the practice of outward and inner holiness, excessive love of God and the delight in his recollection (dhikr) and Holy names.’


To this one might add the (usually temporary) practice of celibacy and the formation of Jewish Sufi Convents, both of which were also supported by R. Obadyah and David II Maimuni.”

©Nachman Davies

(from p42 of The Mitkarevim)